Excerpts from Greg Stark's message of jue mar 03 13:02:53 -0300 2011:
> But I'm not sure it's worth bothering. Filling in the description
> field is hardly the most annoying part of adding pg_proc entries for
> operators. If we could move most or all of the entries to an SQL file
> so that we didn't have to deal with commutator and negator oids and
> all that, that would save a lot of pain.
You seem to want to have a completely new way to describe contents of
pg_proc.h and pg_operator.h, from which the DATA and DESCR lines could
be generated. Perhaps that's a worthy goal, not sure. I'm not sure it
can be done with SQL though.
--
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
