Vik Fearing <vik@postgresfriends.org> writes:
> On 6/12/20 7:00 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> If we did that, you'd never see Inf in a
>> standard-conforming column, since SQL doesn't allow unconstrained
>> numeric columns IIRC.
> It does. The precision and scale are both optional.
> If the precision is missing, it's implementation defined; if the scale
> is missing, it's 0.
Ah, right, the way in which we deviate from the spec is that an
unconstrained numeric column doesn't coerce every entry to scale 0.
Still, that *is* a spec deviation, so adding "... and it allows Inf"
doesn't seem like it's making things worse for spec-compliant apps.
regards, tom lane
