On Tue, 2011-03-01 at 22:56 +0000, Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-03-01 at 12:42 -0800, Josh Berkus wrote:
> > > That response is just dodging the hard question, so whatever. Tom's
> > > cleanup is not going to break things, or at least it's going to fix
> > > more than it breaks on net. Sync rep, on the other hand, is going to
> > > do the opposite, probably by a large margin.
> >
> > Well, we need to at least give Simon and Fujii a chance to respond
> > during their respective daytime hours.
>
> Friday is a reasonable deadline.
I'm not going to be committing Sync Rep today.
It's technically in very good shape, but some of the conceptual issues
aren't clear enough on a Friday night to make it sensible for me to
commit to PostgreSQL, given we must support it for 5 years if I do.
I believe those things are resolvable for 9.1, probably fairly soon, but
I'm not going to rush a commit just to hit a deadline. That isn't the
Way of Quality that we have followed for so long.
I'll let y'all discuss what to do next.
-- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/books/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services
