Re: ALTER TYPE COLLATABLE? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: ALTER TYPE COLLATABLE?
Date
Msg-id 1298998059.30816.0.camel@vanquo.pezone.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: ALTER TYPE COLLATABLE?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: ALTER TYPE COLLATABLE?
List pgsql-hackers
On fre, 2011-02-18 at 11:45 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> While testing a fix for this, I observe that pg_dump is entirely
> broken on the subject, because it fails to dump anything at all about
> the typcollation property when dumping a base type.

This is now fixed.

> I also rather wonder
> exactly what pg_dump would dump to restore a value of
> pg_type.typcollation that's not either 0 or 100.

It does what pg_dump does with other unrecognized or invalid type
attributes: it ignores them.




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: OSSP gone missing? Fate of UUID?
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: pl/python custom datatype parsers