Re: pl/python tracebacks - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: pl/python tracebacks
Date
Msg-id 1298733011.26135.2.camel@vanquo.pezone.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pl/python tracebacks  (Jan Urbański <wulczer@wulczer.org>)
Responses Re: pl/python tracebacks  (Jan Urbański <wulczer@wulczer.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
On lör, 2011-02-26 at 09:34 +0100, Jan Urbański wrote:
> ----- Original message -----
> > On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 9:03 AM, Jan Urbański <wulczer@wulczer.org>
> > wrote:
> > > On 24/02/11 14:10, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > > Hm, perhaps, I put it in the details, because it sounded like the place
> > > to put information that is not that important, but still helpful. It's
> > > kind of natural to think of the traceback as the detail of the error
> > > message. But if you prefer context, I'm fine with that. You want me to
> > > update the patch to put the traceback in the context?
> > 
> > I don't see a response to this question from Peter, but I read his
> > email to indicate that he was hoping you'd rework along these lines.
> 
> I can do that, but not until Monday evening.

Well, I was hoping for some other opinion, but I guess my request
stands.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: pl/python explicit subtransactions
Next
From: Magnus Hagander
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_basebackup and wal streaming