Excerpts from Joachim Wieland's message of vie feb 18 21:41:51 -0300 2011:
> On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 8:57 PM, Alvaro Herrera
> <alvherre@commandprompt.com> wrote:
> > 1. why are you using the expansible char array stuff instead of using
> > the StringInfo facility?
> >
> > 2. is md5 the most appropriate digest for this? If you need a
> > cryptographically secure hash, do we need something stronger? If not,
> > why not just use hash_any?
>
> We don't need a cryptographically secure hash.
Ok.
> Should I send an updated patch? Anything else?
No need, I'm halfway through already.
--
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
