On Tue, 2011-01-25 at 20:55 +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> What do we want to do with them...
>
> Andrew has set it up for the bulidfarm client code, and it does work,
> except they get caught in the moderator queue - becuase they are sent
> from noreply@github.com. The way I see it we have a couple of options
> for making this work:
>
> 1) Whiltelist noreply@github.com. We have no way of controlling this
> though, so *anybody* with a github repo can have it sent there, and
> they all come from the same address. I don't think we can whitelist on
> the combination of email and some part of the email,thus filtering
> based on repo.
>
> 2) Just moderate the commit messages as they show up.
>
> 3) Ask Andrew to move the primary to git.postgresql.org and use the
> commit message hook there, that will send the emails as the person who
> committed the patch (like we do for pgadmin for example). This has the
> advantage of allowing individual moderation, and the disadvantage that
> it doesn't scale if we want to end up with lots of repositories
> management-wise...
>
If we are bouncing to .Org it seems we should be using .Org. I certainly
don't want to moderate commit messages.
JD
> Thoughts?
>
> --
> Magnus Hagander
> Me: http://www.hagander.net/
> Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
>
--
PostgreSQL.org Major Contributor
Command Prompt, Inc: http://www.commandprompt.com/ - 509.416.6579
Consulting, Training, Support, Custom Development, Engineering
http://twitter.com/cmdpromptinc | http://identi.ca/commandprompt
