Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 12:29 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> ... we don't normally read the config file within-commands,
>> and there are both semantic and implementation problems to overcome
>> if you want to do so.
> Why would you need to? It seems to me that we ought to be able to
> rewrite a machine-generated configuration file without loading those
> values into the current session.
Well, Magnus' proposed implementation supposed that the existing values
*have* been loaded into the current session. I agree that with some
locking and yet more code you could implement it without that. But this
still doesn't seem to offer any detectable benefit over value-per-file.
regards, tom lane
