Re: texteq/byteaeq: avoid detoast [REVIEW] - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: texteq/byteaeq: avoid detoast [REVIEW]
Date
Msg-id 1295324335.12898.8.camel@vanquo.pezone.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: texteq/byteaeq: avoid detoast [REVIEW]  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On mån, 2011-01-17 at 15:33 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> > On mån, 2011-01-17 at 07:35 +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> >> In fact, aren't there cases where the *length test* also fails?
> 
> > Currently, two text values are only equal of strcoll() considers them
> > equal and the bits are the same.  So this patch is safe in that regard.
> 
> > There is, however, some desire to loosen this.
> 
> That isn't ever going to happen, unless you'd like to give up hash joins
> and hash aggregation on text values.

Since citext exists and supports hashing, it's obviously possible
nevertheless.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jim Nasby
Date:
Subject: Re: limiting hint bit I/O
Next
From: "Kevin Grittner"
Date:
Subject: Re: SSI patch version 12