On fre, 2011-01-14 at 18:45 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 3:45 PM, Marti Raudsepp <marti@juffo.org>
> wrote:
> > There's a similar case with CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS, maybe this
> is
> > worth covering in an updated patch too?
> > And if I change that, people might expect the same from DROP X IF
> EXISTS too?
>
> It's far less clear what you'd change those cases to say, and they
> already emit a NOTICE, so it seems unnecessary.
Maybe instead of the proposed patch, a notice could be added:
NOTICE: existing object was replaced
