Re: Evaluation of secondary sort key. - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Evaluation of secondary sort key.
Date
Msg-id 12951.1303153172@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Evaluation of secondary sort key.  (Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu>)
List pgsql-hackers
Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu> writes:
> A lot of SQL queries end up being written with GROUP BY primary_key,
> other_column, other_column, other_column just to get those other
> columns to be queryable. If we implemented the SQL standard
> "dependent" columns feature this would be unnecessary but we don't

We do as of 9.1 ...
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Re: Formatting Curmudgeons WAS: MMAP Buffers
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Formatting Curmudgeons WAS: MMAP Buffers