Re: SSI 2PC coverage - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: SSI 2PC coverage
Date
Msg-id 12940.1314234718@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: SSI 2PC coverage  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>)
Responses Re: SSI 2PC coverage
Re: SSI 2PC coverage
List pgsql-hackers
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> writes:
> After having to play with this, I didn't like it very much, because
> regression.diffs gets spammed with the (rather massive and completely
> useless) diff in that test.  For the xml tests, rather than ignoring it
> fail on an installation without libxml, we use an alternative output.

> Unless there are objections, I will commit the alternative file proposed
> by Dan.

+1 ... "ignore" is a pretty ugly hack here.

Eventually we need some way of detecting that specific tests should be
skipped because they're irrelevant to the current system configuration.
contrib/sepgsql is already doing something of the sort, but it's rather
crude ...
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_restore --no-post-data and --post-data-only
Next
From: John Wang
Date:
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] blog post on ancient history