On mån, 2010-12-13 at 14:45 +0900, Shigeru HANADA wrote:
> Simple FDWs such as File FDW might not have concept of "user" on
> remote side. In such case, it would be enough to control access
> privilege per local user with GRANT/REVOKE SELECT statement.
Right. But it depends on the implementation. You could, for example,
imagine a "userdir" FDW that reads from users' home directories.
> To allow omitting column definitions for that purpose, a way to create
> ero-column tables would have to be provided. New syntax which allows
> FDWs to determine column definition would be necessary.
>
> ex)
> -- Create foo from the remote table foo on the server bar
> CREATE FOREIGN TABLE foo SERVER bar;
> -- Create zero-column table foo
> CREATE FOREIGN TABLE foo () SERVER bar;
That syntax seems pretty obvious.
