Re: [HACKERS] v10 pg_ctl compatibility - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [HACKERS] v10 pg_ctl compatibility
Date
Msg-id 12919.1506456601@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] v10 pg_ctl compatibility  (Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] v10 pg_ctl compatibility  (Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com> writes:
> To add insult to injury, when v10 pg_ctl does restart a pre-10 server and
> it sits there for a long time waiting for it to start up even though it has
> already started up, if I hit ctrl-C because I assume something is horribly
> wrong, it then goes ahead and kills the successfully started-and-running
> server.

Really?  The server should have detached itself from your terminal
group long before that.  What platform is this?
        regards, tom lane


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] BUG #14825: enum type: unsafe use?
Next
From: Maksim Milyutin
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS][BUG] Cache invalidation for queries that contains constof temporary composite type