Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Improved parallel make support - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Improved parallel make support
Date
Msg-id 1289671662.13321.9.camel@vanquo.pezone.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Improved parallel make support  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Improved parallel make support
List pgsql-hackers
On lör, 2010-11-13 at 12:20 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> > On lör, 2010-11-13 at 11:12 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> It looks like all the unhappy critters are getting the same "virtual
> >> memory exhausted" error.  I wonder whether they are all using make
> >> 3.80 ...
> 
> > It turns out that there is an unrelated bug in 3.80 that some Linux
> > distributions have patched around.  3.81 or 3.82 are OK.
> 
> So what do you mean by "unrelated bug"?  Can we work around it?

The information is fuzzy, but the problem has been reported around the
internet, and it appears to be related to the foreach function.  I think
I have an idea how to work around it, but I'll need some time.




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: 8.4-vintage problem in postmaster.c
Next
From: Hannu Krosing
Date:
Subject: Re: HOT updates in index-less tables