Re: ALTER OBJECT any_name SET SCHEMA name - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: ALTER OBJECT any_name SET SCHEMA name
Date
Msg-id 1288907814-sup-2219@alvh.no-ip.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: ALTER OBJECT any_name SET SCHEMA name  (Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndQuadrant.fr>)
Responses Re: ALTER OBJECT any_name SET SCHEMA name
List pgsql-hackers
Excerpts from Dimitri Fontaine's message of jue nov 04 16:42:53 -0300 2010:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> writes:
> > 2. I think the guts of AlterExtensionNamespace (the large switch block)
> > should be elsewhere, probably in alter.c
> 
> That's implemented in the alter_extension patch v2, and that's much
> better, thanks for your continued input. Please note that it depends on
> the new set_schema.6.patch.

Hmm, seeing the amount of new includes in extension.c, I wonder if it'd
be better to move AlterExtensionNamespace to alter.c.

> (The problem with smaller patches is indeed the dependencies)

You can't please them all, I guess ...

-- 
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: lazy snapshots?
Next
From: Fujii Masao
Date:
Subject: Re: timestamp of the last replayed transaction