Re: [PATCH] Custom code int(32|64) => text conversions out of performance reasons - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: [PATCH] Custom code int(32|64) => text conversions out of performance reasons
Date
Msg-id 1288682038.30827.2.camel@fsopti579.F-Secure.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to [PATCH] Custom code int(32|64) => text conversions out of performance reasons  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Responses Re: [PATCH] Custom code int(32|64) => text conversions out of performance reasons
List pgsql-hackers
On sön, 2010-10-31 at 22:41 +0100, Andres Freund wrote:
> * I renamed pg_[il]toa to pg_s(16|32|64)toa - I found the names
> confusing. Not sure if its worth it.

Given that there are widely established functions atoi() and atol(),
naming the reverse itoa() and ltoa() makes a lot of sense.  The changed
versions read like "string to ASCII".



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Vaibhav Kaushal
Date:
Subject: Fwd: Starting off with the development
Next
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: SR fails to send existing WAL file after off-line copy