Re: max_wal_senders must die - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Joshua D. Drake
Subject Re: max_wal_senders must die
Date
Msg-id 1288311723.22359.178.camel@jd-desktop
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: max_wal_senders must die  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, 2010-10-28 at 17:12 -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
> > Sorry, didn't know... I have 122 responses so far, which I think will be
> > surprising (some of them certainly surprised me). I will keep it open
> > until next week and then post the results.
> 
> Well, for any community site poll, I hope you realize that there's a LOT
> of sampling error.  Here's another one:
> 
> http://www.postgresql.org/community/survey.71
> 

Oh sure. I don't expect this to be some kind of authoritative reference
but it is certainly worth at least reviewing. If nothing else it is fun
to see the responses and consider their meaning based on your own views.

JD

-- 
PostgreSQL.org Major Contributor
Command Prompt, Inc: http://www.commandprompt.com/ - 509.416.6579
Consulting, Training, Support, Custom Development, Engineering
http://twitter.com/cmdpromptinc | http://identi.ca/commandprompt



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: Re: max_wal_senders must die
Next
From: Jeff Janes
Date:
Subject: sorted writes for checkpoints