Re: max_wal_senders must die - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Joshua D. Drake
Subject Re: max_wal_senders must die
Date
Msg-id 1288297407.22359.36.camel@jd-desktop
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: max_wal_senders must die  ("Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>)
Responses Re: max_wal_senders must die
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, 2010-10-28 at 07:05 -0500, Kevin Grittner wrote:
> "Joshua D. Drake"  wrote:
> > On Wed, 2010-10-27 at 19:52 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> >> Josh Berkus  wrote:
> >  
> >>> *you don't know* how many .org users plan to implement
> >>> replication, whether it's a minority or majority.
> >>
> >> None of us know. What I do know is that I don't want PostgreSQL to
> >> be slower out of the box.
> > 
> > Poll TIME!
>  
> If you do take a poll, be careful to put in an option or two to deal
> with environments where there is "surgical" implementation of
> replication features.  

And Poll it is:

https://www.postgresqlconference.org/content/replication-poll

You don't have to login to take it but of course it helps with validity
of results.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake

-- 
PostgreSQL.org Major Contributor
Command Prompt, Inc: http://www.commandprompt.com/ - 509.416.6579
Consulting, Training, Support, Custom Development, Engineering
http://twitter.com/cmdpromptinc | http://identi.ca/commandprompt



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: psql autocompletion for \z and \dg
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: contsel and gist