Re: Postgres insert performance and storage requirement compared to Oracle - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Joshua D. Drake
Subject Re: Postgres insert performance and storage requirement compared to Oracle
Date
Msg-id 1288030833.8930.30.camel@jd-desktop
Whole thread Raw
In response to Postgres insert performance and storage requirement compared to Oracle  (Divakar Singh <dpsmails@yahoo.com>)
Responses Re: Postgres insert performance and storage requirement compared to Oracle
List pgsql-performance
On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 11:12 -0700, Divakar Singh wrote:

> My questions/scenarios are:
>
> 1. How does PostgreSQL perform when inserting data into an indexed
> (type: btree)
> table? Is it true that as you add the indexes on a table, the
> performance
> deteriorates significantly whereas Oracle does not show that much
> performance
> decrease. I have tried almost all postgreSQL performance tips
> available. I want
> to have very good "insert" performance (with indexes), "select"
> performance is
> not that important at this point of time.

Did you test?

>
> 2. What are the average storage requirements of postgres compared to
> Oracle? I
> inserted upto 1 million records. The storage requirement of postgreSQL
> is almost
> double than that of Oracle.

What was your table structure?

Joshua D. Drake


--
PostgreSQL.org Major Contributor
Command Prompt, Inc: http://www.commandprompt.com/ - 509.416.6579
Consulting, Training, Support, Custom Development, Engineering
http://twitter.com/cmdpromptinc | http://identi.ca/commandprompt


pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Divakar Singh
Date:
Subject: Postgres insert performance and storage requirement compared to Oracle
Next
From: Scott Marlowe
Date:
Subject: Re: Postgres insert performance and storage requirement compared to Oracle