Re: pg_auth_members.grantor is bunk - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: pg_auth_members.grantor is bunk
Date
Msg-id 1287111.1663793632@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_auth_members.grantor is bunk  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 1:26 PM Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>> CI is happier with this version, so I've committed 0001. If no major
>> problems emerge, I'll proceed with 0002 as well.

> Done.

Shouldn't the CF entry [1] be closed as committed?

            regards, tom lane

[1] https://commitfest.postgresql.org/39/3745/



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Nathan Bossart
Date:
Subject: Re: Reducing the WAL overhead of freezing in VACUUM by deduplicating per-tuple freeze plans
Next
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: Reducing the WAL overhead of freezing in VACUUM by deduplicating per-tuple freeze plans