On fre, 2010-10-08 at 11:19 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Was this just a thinko in our transcription, or did they rename the
> view columns somewhere along the line?
I suppose you figured this out already, but in some of my older draft
copies, the column did indeed have a different name. The other columns
were just copying mistakes, apparently.
> Perhaps more to the point, what shall we do about it? Just renaming
> the view columns is easy enough, but should we try to do something to
> limit the impact on existing clients?
I wouldn't worry about it unless we get complaints. Users can change
the view easily enough if they need.
