On fre, 2010-09-24 at 14:42 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> How do we want to define "system" exactly? My original proposal was
> for bare \dn to hide the temp and toast schemas. If we consider that
> what it's hiding is "system" schemas then there's some merit to the
> idea that it should hide pg_catalog and information_schema too.
> In that case, in a fresh database you would *only* see "public".
> I'm not sure that I like this though. Comments?
I think that is sensible.
