Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 1:57 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Perhaps I'm confused, but doesn't AfterTriggerEnlargeQueryState()
>> need to ensure there are at least query_depth + 1 entries in the
>> arrays? Not just query_depth?
> Hmm, I think you're right. Like this?
Yeah, that's what I meant.
regards, tom lane