Re: Another Modest Proposal: Platforms - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Joshua D. Drake
Subject Re: Another Modest Proposal: Platforms
Date
Msg-id 1285189338.25937.97.camel@jd-desktop.unknown.charter.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Another Modest Proposal: Platforms  (David Fetter <david@fetter.org>)
Responses Re: Another Modest Proposal: Platforms
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, 2010-09-22 at 13:58 -0700, David Fetter wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 04:28:04PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > David Fetter <david@fetter.org> writes:
> > > We can start by supporting only platforms git runs on, this being
> > > the first in what I'd picture as a set of base requirements.
> >
> > Sounds like allowing the tail to wag the dog.
>
> "Runs git" is actually not a bad proxy for "has modern developer
> tools."
>
> This would be the first, as I mentioned, of a list of base functional
> requirements.

David,

Perhaps you could suggest some more specific ideas of your proposal? I
mean I am with you on the idea of reducing our supported platforms. I
see no reason to support

<Solaris 9
<NetBSD in any form
<FreeBSD <6
<Any Linux not supported by its own community (e.g; FC9)
<Irix
<> SCO

Note: I am not actually advocating this as much as stating my own
personal opinion.

Joshua D. Drake

--
PostgreSQL.org Major Contributor
Command Prompt, Inc: http://www.commandprompt.com/ - 509.416.6579
Consulting, Training, Support, Custom Development, Engineering
http://twitter.com/cmdpromptinc | http://identi.ca/commandprompt

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: Why is time with timezone 12 bytes?
Next
From: David Fetter
Date:
Subject: Re: Another Modest Proposal: Platforms