Re: Git conversion status - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: Git conversion status
Date
Msg-id 1285010426.20510.38.camel@vanquo.pezone.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Git conversion status  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Git conversion status  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On mån, 2010-09-20 at 15:09 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> I wouldn't be against that necessarily if we were
> keeping the keywords and not getting rid of them.  But since we are
> going to get rid of them going forward, I think what we want this
> conversion to do is match what's in the historical tarballs.

Stupid question: Why don't you get rid of the key words beforehand?



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Git conversion status
Next
From: Stefan Kaltenbrunner
Date:
Subject: Re: Git conversion status