On Fri, 2010-09-17 at 09:15 +0100, Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-09-17 at 11:09 +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> > That said, there's a few small things that can be progressed
> > regardless of the details of synchronous replication. There's the
> > changes to trigger failover with a signal, and it seems that we'll
> > need some libpq changes to allow acknowledgments to be sent back to
> > the master regardless of the rest of the design. We can discuss those
> > in separate threads in parallel.
>
> Agree to both of those points.
But I don't agree that those things should be committed just yet.
-- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.comPostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services
