Re: UTF16 surrogate pairs in UTF8 encoding - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: UTF16 surrogate pairs in UTF8 encoding
Date
Msg-id 1283885687.2517.11.camel@vanquo.pezone.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: UTF16 surrogate pairs in UTF8 encoding  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: UTF16 surrogate pairs in UTF8 encoding  (Marko Kreen <markokr@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On sön, 2010-08-22 at 15:15 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > We combine the surrogate pair components to a single code point and
> > encode that in UTF-8.  We don't encode the components separately;
> that
> > would be wrong.
> 
> Oh, OK.  Should the docs make that a bit clearer?

Done.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Sergey Konoplev
Date:
Subject: Re: function_name.parameter_name
Next
From: Jeff Davis
Date:
Subject: Re: "Freezing" per-role settings