Re: Progress indication prototype - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: Progress indication prototype
Date
Msg-id 1282065143.25113.1.camel@vanquo.pezone.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Progress indication prototype  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On tis, 2010-08-17 at 08:31 -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
> Will we be able to use it for psql while keeping just one database
> connection?  I assume the answer is 'no', but it sure would be nice..

How do you expect that to behave?  I suppose the backend could send
NOTICE-like messages every 1% or so, and then psql could try to display
that in some way (which?), but then I suspect that a) it will annoy some
people, so b) it will have to be off by default, and then c) it won't be
enabled when you need it.




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Kevin Grittner"
Date:
Subject: Re: security label support, part.2
Next
From: Cédric Villemain
Date:
Subject: Re: PL/pgSQL EXECUTE '..' USING with unknown