Re: per table random-page-cost? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: per table random-page-cost?
Date
Msg-id 12816.1255991615@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: per table random-page-cost?  (marcin mank <marcin.mank@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
marcin mank <marcin.mank@gmail.com> writes:
> I thought about making it per-table, but realistically I think most
> people don`t use tablespaces now. I would not want to be telling
> people "to be able to hint the planner to (not) index-scan the table,
> You must move it to a separate tablespace".

Per-table is not physically sensible.  Per-tablespace has some rationale
to it.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: LATERAL
Next
From: Andrew Gierth
Date:
Subject: Re: LATERAL