Re: [PATCH] Re: Adding xpath_exists function - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: [PATCH] Re: Adding xpath_exists function
Date
Msg-id 1281061552-sup-8773@alvh.no-ip.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCH] Re: Adding xpath_exists function  (Mike Fowler <mike@mlfowler.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Excerpts from Mike Fowler's message of mar jun 29 06:37:28 -0400 2010:

> After seeing some other posts in the last couple of days, I realised I 
> hadn't documented the function in the SGML. I have now done so, and 
> added a couple of tests with XML literals. Please find the patch 
> attached. Now time to go correct the xmlexists patch too...

Hmm, is 0 a valid node number in a xmlNodeSet?  If it is, searching for
the zeroth node would make the code call PG_RETURN_BOOL(0), no?

-- 
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: LockDatabaseObject vs. LockSharedObject
Next
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: Initial review of xslt with no limits patch