Re: permission inconsistency with functions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: permission inconsistency with functions
Date
Msg-id 1279911356.22066.0.camel@vanquo.pezone.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to permission inconsistency with functions  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Responses Re: permission inconsistency with functions
Re: permission inconsistency with functions
List pgsql-hackers
On fre, 2010-07-23 at 11:48 -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> "In particular, it must have read access to all tables that you want
> to
> back up, so in practice you almost always have to run it as a database
> superuser."
> 
> Ignoring the fact that databases have a lot more objects than tables,
> there is no READ/SELECT permission for functions. Thus in order to
> backup a function, I must have EXECUTE permissions on the function.
> Further if I don't have EXECUTE permissions I can still see the
> function in pg_proc.

In order to back up a table's contents you must read it, but you don't
need to execute a function in order to back it up.  It's not
inconsistent, it's just different.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: permission inconsistency with functions
Next
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: review: psql: edit function, show function commands patch