On fre, 2010-07-16 at 08:55 -0500, Kevin Grittner wrote: > Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote: > > > I didn't see any discussion about why this should return float8 > > rather than numeric. It seems wrong to use float8 for this. > > That discussion took place several months ago on the -bugs list. > I'll paste some links from a quick search of the archives below. > Since multiplication of money is by float8 and not numeric, it > ultimately seemed more consistent to me to have the results of > division be float8. I felt that as long as we had a cast between > money and numeric, someone could always cast to numeric if they > wanted that style of division. > > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2010-03/msg00233.php > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2010-03/msg00241.php > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2010-03/msg00244.php > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2010-03/msg00245.php > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2010-04/msg00006.php I read most of these messages rather as advocating the use of NUMERIC. Also, the multiplication problem can be addressed by adding a money * numeric operator.
pgsql-hackers by date:
Соглашаюсь с условиями обработки персональных данных