On Fri, 2010-07-09 at 14:01 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com> writes:
> > On Fri, 2010-07-09 at 13:21 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Except that it *is* a change in behavior: the first check will occur
> >> too soon.
>
> > Sooner matters why?
>
> Consider PREPARE followed only later by EXECUTE. Your proposal would
> make the PREPARE fail outright, when it currently does not.
Just to avoid wasted investigation: are you saying that is important
behaviour that is essential we retain in PostgreSQL, or will you hear
evidence that supporting that leads to a performance decrease elsewhere?
-- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.comPostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services
