Re: Keepalive for max_standby_delay - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Simon Riggs
Subject Re: Keepalive for max_standby_delay
Date
Msg-id 1277924896.4151.274.camel@ebony
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Keepalive for max_standby_delay  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
Responses Re: Keepalive for max_standby_delay  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, 2010-06-28 at 10:09 -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
> > It will get done.  It is not the very first thing on my to-do list.
> 
> ???  What is then?
> 
> If it's not the first thing on your priority list, with 9.0 getting 
> later by the day, maybe we should leave it to Robert and Simon, who *do* 
> seem to have it first on *their* list?
> 
> I swear, when Simon was keeping his branch to himself in August everyone 
> was on his case.  It sure seems like Tom is doing exactly the same thing.

Hmmm, yes, looks that way. At that time I was actively working on the
code, not just locking it to prevent other activity.

The only urgency on my part here was to fulfil my responsibility to the
project.

-- Simon Riggs           www.2ndQuadrant.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Devrim GÜNDÜZ
Date:
Subject: Keeping separate WAL segments for each database
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: Keeping separate WAL segments for each database