Re: [pgsql-www] ANNOUNCE list (was Re: New PGXN Extension site) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Joshua D. Drake
Subject Re: [pgsql-www] ANNOUNCE list (was Re: New PGXN Extension site)
Date
Msg-id 1276788681.7244.0.camel@jd-desktop.unknown.charter.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: ANNOUNCE list (was Re: New PGXN Extension site)  ("Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg@turnstep.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, 2010-06-17 at 13:22 +0000, Greg Sabino Mullane wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: RIPEMD160
>
>
> > What I'm referring to? The fact that at least last time I was looking
> > at this, most (all other?) moderators *only* approve things. And never
> > reject them, instead letting the timeout take care of things thatn
> > shouldn't be posted.
>
> Certainly not all, becuase I don't do things that way. And certainly
> not -announce, because I don't think Marc works that way either.

Uhh the complaint above is bogus. I know I don't just approve things
either.

>
> As far as the original complaint, if one suspects something is stuck
> in the queue, a message to #postgresql might be the quickest way
> to get someone's attention, followed by an email to -www.
>

Agreed.

> But my all means, let's add more mods, especially to -announce as
> Marc, Rob, and I are all in the same time zone.
>

Agreed.

Joshua D. Drake

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Greg Stark
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_dump does not honor namespaces when functions are used in index
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Should the JSON datatype be a specialization of text?