On fre, 2010-06-11 at 07:10 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 2:51 AM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote:
> > On tis, 2010-06-08 at 16:17 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> >> > Perhaps
> >> > ->
> >>
> >> That's already in use to mean something else.
> >
> > Btw., the SQL standard also defines -> for something else, so if you
> > wanted to be really visionary, you could deprecate that one as an
> > operator at the same time.
>
> Ouch. What does it define it to mean?
Similar to C: Dereferencing a reference and accessing a member.
