Excerpts from Russell Smith's message of mié jun 02 06:38:35 -0400 2010:
> Don't you not get a positive enough effect by adjusting the table's
> autovacuum_min_freeze_age and autovacuum_max_freeze_age. If you set
> those numbers small, it appears to me that you would get very quickly to
> a state where the vacuum would example only the most recent part of the
> table rather than the whole thing.
The problem is that vacuum doesn't know that a certain part of the table
is already frozen. It needs to scan it completely anyways. If we had a
"frozen" map, we could mark pages that are completely frozen and thus do
not need any vacuuming; but we don't (I don't recall the reasons for
this. Maybe it's just that no one has gotten around to it, or maybe
there's something else).
--
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
