Kim Bisgaard <kib+pg@dmi.dk> writes:
> SELECT station_id, timeobs,temp_grass, temp_dry_at_2m
> FROM temp_dry_at_2m a
> FULL OUTER JOIN temp_grass b
> USING (station_id, timeobs)
> WHERE station_id = 52981
> AND timeobs = '2004-1-1 0:0:0'
> explain analyse SELECT b.station_id, b.timeobs,temp_grass, temp_dry_at_2m
> FROM temp_dry_at_2m a
> FULL OUTER JOIN temp_grass b
> USING (station_id, timeobs)
> WHERE b.station_id = 52981
> AND b.timeobs = '2004-1-1 0:0:0'
> Why will PostgreSQL not use the same plan for both these queries - they
> are virtually identical??
Because they're semantically completely different. The second query is
effectively a RIGHT JOIN, because join rows in which b is all-null will
be thrown away by the WHERE. The optimizer sees this (note your second
plan doesn't use a Full Join step anywhere) and is able to produce a
much better plan. Full outer join is difficult to optimize, in part
because we have no choice but to use a merge join for it --- the other
join types don't support full join.
regards, tom lane
