On Wed, 2010-05-26 at 15:37 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 3:13 PM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> >> I don't really understand this comment. I have said, and I believe,
> >> that a system without quorum commit is simpler than one with quorum
> >> commit. I'd debate the point with you but I find the point so
> >> self-evident that I don't even know where to begin arguing it.
> >
> >> It's simply an opinion, which I believe to
> >> be based on solid technical reasoning, but which I might change my
> >> mind about if someone convinces me that I'm looking at the problem the
> >> wrong way.
> >
> > You're saying you have solid technical reasons, but they are so
> > self-evident that you can't even begin to argue them. Why are you so
> > sure your reasons are solid?? Regrettably, I say this doesn't make any
> > sense, however much you write.
>
> Yeah, especially when you juxtapose two different parts of my email
> that were talking about different things.
/me rings bell and orders the fighters to their respective corners.
>
> --
> Robert Haas
> EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
> The Enterprise Postgres Company
>
--
PostgreSQL.org Major Contributor
Command Prompt, Inc: http://www.commandprompt.com/ - 503.667.4564
Consulting, Training, Support, Custom Development, Engineering
