On Wed, 2010-05-26 at 07:10 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> OK. In words of one syllable, your way still has all the same knobs,
> plus some more.
I explained how the per-standby settings would take many parameters,
whereas per-transaction settings take far fewer.
> You sketched out a design which still had a per-standby setting for
> each standby, but IN ADDITION had a setting for a setting to control
> quorum commit[1].
No, you misread it. Again. The parameters were not IN ADDITION -
obviously so, otherwise I wouldn't claim there were fewer, would I?
Your reply has again avoided the subject of how we would handle failure
modes with per-standby settings. That is important.
-- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
