Re: Stefan's bug (was: max_standby_delay considered harmful) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Simon Riggs
Subject Re: Stefan's bug (was: max_standby_delay considered harmful)
Date
Msg-id 1274080439.28911.80.camel@ebony
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Stefan's bug (was: max_standby_delay considered harmful)  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Stefan's bug (was: max_standby_delay considered harmful)
List pgsql-hackers
On Sun, 2010-05-16 at 21:25 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:

> I have what I believe is
> an equivalent but simpler implementation, which is attached.

There's no code comments to explain this, so without in-depth analysis
of the problem, Masao's patch and this one its not possible to say
anything.

Please explain in detail why its the right approach and put that in a
comment, so we'll understand now and in the future.

-- Simon Riggs           www.2ndQuadrant.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: Keepalive for max_standby_delay
Next
From: Fujii Masao
Date:
Subject: Re: Stefan's bug (was: max_standby_delay considered harmful)