Re: quoting and recovery.conf - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Simon Riggs
Subject Re: quoting and recovery.conf
Date
Msg-id 1273815704.308.3055.camel@ebony
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: quoting and recovery.conf  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: quoting and recovery.conf
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, 2010-05-13 at 21:15 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu> writes:
> > On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 11:33 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> I think we should add a TODO to parse recovery.conf with the same code
> >> we use to parse postgresql.conf, or possibly merge the two files.
> >> This issue was previously alluded to here:
> >> 
> >> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2010-04/msg00211.php
> 
> > And more than alluded to here:
> 
> > http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/407d949e1002131017u657e4aefo2647c2cbf24fe7b4@mail.gmail.com
> 
> The main reason for having a separate recovery.conf file is that its
> existence is what drives the setting of InArchiveRecovery.  If we were
> to devise some other trigger for that condition, it'd be possible to
> fold all those settings in as GUC variables.

And the removal of recovery.conf at end of recovery prevents the
re-entry into archive recovery if we crash.

-- Simon Riggs           www.2ndQuadrant.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Re: List traffic
Next
From: Anssi Kääriäinen
Date:
Subject: Re: Row-level Locks & SERIALIZABLE transactions, postgres vs. Oracle