On tor, 2010-05-13 at 04:41 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> > Right, and omitting tags was in fact one of the "features" of fromcvs
> > that made us use it, because any tool that tries to convert tags will
> > explode on our CVS tree, for reasons explained in the above paragraph.
> >
> > We have also discussed this in more detail about three times before.
>
> Well, yes, but I have been wondering if this has to be an all or nothing
> deal. How many tags can we not tie to a known tree in git? My suspicion
> is we can probably identify most of them quite well. If we can that
> would be nice.
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2008-04/msg00036.php
