Re: max_standby_delay considered harmful - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Simon Riggs
Subject Re: max_standby_delay considered harmful
Date
Msg-id 1273693209.308.1062.camel@ebony
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: max_standby_delay considered harmful  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, 2010-05-12 at 15:36 -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> I just noticed that we have some code assigning the return value of
> time() to a pg_time_t variable.  Is this supposed to work reliably?
> (xlog.c lines 9267ff)

Code's used that for a while now. Checkpoints and everywhere.

-- Simon Riggs           www.2ndQuadrant.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Greg Sabino Mullane
Date:
Subject: pg_dump should not try CREATE OR REPLACE LANGUAGE < 9.0
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: List traffic