Re: pg_upgrade versus MSVC build scripts - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: pg_upgrade versus MSVC build scripts
Date
Msg-id 1273691327-sup-5352@alvh.no-ip.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to pg_upgrade versus MSVC build scripts  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: pg_upgrade versus MSVC build scripts
List pgsql-hackers
Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of mié may 12 14:07:13 -0400 2010:

> We could try to make this a supported build arrangement, but I'm
> inclined to think that a cleaner solution is to split out the loadable
> module as a separate contrib subdirectory.  Thoughts?

Do you mean contrib/pg_upgrade/somelib?  If so, +1.  If you instead mean
putting the library in contrib/somelib, I'm not so sure that it's
cleaner than trying to support executable+shared lib in a single contrib
module.
-- 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Stefan Kaltenbrunner
Date:
Subject: Re: max_standby_delay considered harmful
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade versus MSVC build scripts