Re: max_standby_delay considered harmful - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Simon Riggs
Subject Re: max_standby_delay considered harmful
Date
Msg-id 1273684875.308.917.camel@ebony
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: max_standby_delay considered harmful  (Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu>)
Responses Re: max_standby_delay considered harmful
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, 2010-05-12 at 18:05 +0100, Greg Stark wrote:

> I'm not sure who to blame for the shouting match over whose commit
> introduced the bug -- it doesn't seem like a relevant or useful thing
> to argue about, please both stop.

I haven't blamed Robert's code, merely asked him to consider that it is
something other HS, since we have no evidence either way at present
because the issue is sporadic and has not been replicated as yet, with
no specific detail leading to any section of code.

> >  there is no need
> > to comment on every thread.
> 
> This is out of line.

Quoted out of context, it is. My full comment is "Please don't continue
to make wild speculations about things related to HS and recovery, so
that issues do not become confused; there is no need to comment on every
thread." ... by which I mean threads related to HS and recovery. I
respect everybody's right to free speech here, but I would say the same
to anyone if they do it repeatedly. I'm not the first to make such a
comment on hackers either.

-- Simon Riggs           www.2ndQuadrant.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Greg Stark
Date:
Subject: Re: max_standby_delay considered harmful
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add PGFILEDESC description to Makefiles for all /contrib