Re: why there is not VACUUM FULL CONCURRENTLY? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Antonin Houska
Subject Re: why there is not VACUUM FULL CONCURRENTLY?
Date
Msg-id 127361.1740559688@localhost
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: why there is not VACUUM FULL CONCURRENTLY?  (Marcos Pegoraro <marcos@f10.com.br>)
List pgsql-hackers
Marcos Pegoraro <marcos@f10.com.br> wrote:

> You mentioned fillfactor only on cluster notes, would be good to mention it
> on refsynopsisdiv, I think.

ok, I've added a note to the first paragraph.

Attached here is the REPACK command as well as the patch set that adds the
CONCURRENTLY option. The new symbols have been renamed so they resemble REPACK
rather than CLUSTER.

Please note that 0008 is a new part which makes the setting wal_leve=logical
unnecessary.

-- 
Antonin Houska
Web: https://www.cybertec-postgresql.com


Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Maxim Orlov
Date:
Subject: Re: Proposal: Limitations of palloc inside checkpointer
Next
From: Jakub Wartak
Date:
Subject: Re: Draft for basic NUMA observability