Daniele Varrazzo <daniele.varrazzo@gmail.com> writes:
> On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 1:04 AM, Andrew Hammond
> <andrew.george.hammond@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 4:53 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>>> [ pokes around for a bit ... ] �Hmm, can you say how the failing query
>>> was submitted, exactly? �I'm wondering if it came in via simple Query
>>> (PQexec) or extended-query protocol (anything with parameters).
>> The command was sent from a python via django-1.2.1 using psycopg2-2.2.1
> PQexec then.
Thanks for the followup. My current theory is that that's unrelated,
though --- it now seems that this is just a race condition in the use of
toasted pg_statistic entries. See
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2011-10/msg01366.php
regards, tom lane
