Re: max_standby_delay considered harmful - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Simon Riggs
Subject Re: max_standby_delay considered harmful
Date
Msg-id 1272984149.4535.2133.camel@ebony
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: max_standby_delay considered harmful  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, 2010-05-04 at 14:49 +0100, Simon Riggs wrote:

> The only difference is that max_standby_delay is measured from log
> timestamp. Perhaps it should work from WAL receipt timestamp rather than
> from log timestamp? That would make some of the problems go away without
> significantly changing the definition. I'll look at that.

Patch to implement this idea posted in response to OT, upthread, so I
can respond to the original complaints directly.

-- Simon Riggs           www.2ndQuadrant.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Reg: SQL Query for Postgres 8.4.3
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Reg: SQL Query for Postgres 8.4.3